(资料图片)

有关waiting for my favorite songs_waiting for这方面的知识，估计很多人不是太了解，今天就给大家详细的介绍一下关于waiting for my favorite songs_waiting for的相关内容。

今天小编肥嘟来为大家解答以上的问题。waiting for my favorite songs，waiting for相信很多小伙伴还不知道,现在让我们一起来看看吧！

1、等待戈多读后感英文版The absurdity in waiting for Godot To some extent,there do be lots of inexplicities in this script.being such an inexplicable script.,it is still regarded as a masterpiece by most of us.the main reason that it being a masterpiece is that people who read this script would be conveyed a sort of gloomy contemplation about our life.the content of the script force us to brood over the things which even do not exist.just like some episodes in the script,we have to adress that as absurdity due to we can not get our thought in touch with the author . However ,if I were ordered to point out some strange and werid episodes,I believe I am still be capable of figuring it out according my limited comprehension First of all ,the reason they wait for Godot is ***.In the real live,every thing we manage to do always happened with our own reason.whereas Vladimir and Esragon(mian characters in the script) just kept on waiting Godot without any reason.The weirder things are that they even do not know when Godot will come up and that they are not sure which exact tree they shoul stand by in order to meet Godot.,Secondly,Vladimir and Esragon`s reasonless behaviour.broadly speaking ,this script is filled up with inexplicable behaviours.For instance,feelind something exotic inside of his boot,Esragom tried to remove his boot from his foot .however,Esragon can not find anything inside after he managed to take it off and then he became unexpected depressed.Another example is that Vladimir abruptly peering out his bleak surroundings while he just talked with Esragon. The apperance of Pozzo and his slave Lucky in the script.they came to my horizon in the middle of the script and the end of the it.At first ,Lucky have been shown himself as Pozzo`s slave by his arduous job.But,surprisingly,Lucky do not leave his master even thought his master Pozzo became a blind (the reason is unknown) in the end of the script.having suffer such a lot,how can Lucy would not leave and regian hie freedom. Who is the boy indeed?The boy came up in the script twice.and in both of his occurances,he only left us a lines of words.and that is “Godot would not come that evening but surely tomorrow”we do not know what exact role that boy play in.what we know literally is that Vladimir and Esragon have to wait another tomorrow.and the boy`s overtune is there will be countless tomorrow in their lives before they die. ,and they never could wait so long. Godot,his has never come up in the script.literally,he just a name.whereas,he is the soul of the script .Not only we but also the author regard him as a notional character in the ***.To some of us ,he is weird and absurd because he does not exist after we have read the whole script .but thaks to his non-existance,it make the room for our readers to imagine .what`s more it make us begin to reconsider the real meaning of the script. From my perspective,Godot is the god,people in the script would never meet him since they are mortal men.i know every thing does not seem very coherent and every interesting before we finish the script.but ,in the moment I read the last word in the script,honest,I have to excliam how elaborate the design it is ,and I know I will take this script as my intangible asset in my life. Also I hope and I think waiting for Godot this book would delight all of us ..having read the whole script,I was deeply delighted and touched by the theme of script.and I think the author is exerting to convey the his feeling,and that is no matter how great we are now.since we are all the mortal,what we should do is barely cherish we would never be bewilder about our unpromising life when we review it. “Nothing to be done,” is one of the many phrases that is repeated again and again throughout Samuel Beckett’s Waiting For Godot. Godot is an existentialist play that reads like somewhat of a language poem. That is to say, Beckett is not interested in the reader interpreting his words, but simply listening to the words and viewing the actions of his perfectly mismatched characters. Beckett uses the standard Vaudevillian style to present a play that savors of the human condition. He repeats phrases, ideas and actions that has his audience come away with many different ideas about who we are and how beautiful our human existence is even in our desperation. The structure of Waiting For Godot is determined by Beckett’s use of repetition. This is demonstrated in the progression of dialogue and action in each of the two acts in Godot. The first thing an audience may notice about Waiting For Godot is that they are immediately set up for a comedy. The first two characters to appear on stage are Vladimir and Estragon, dressed in bowler hats and boots. These characters lend themselves to the same body types as Abbot and Costello. Vladimir is usually cast as tall and thin and Estragon just the opposite. Each character is involved in a comedic action from the plays beginning. Estragon is struggling with a tightly fitting boot that he just cannot seem to take off his foot. Vladimir is moving around bowlegged because of a bladder problem. From this beat on the characters move through a what amounts to a comedy routine. A day in the life of two hapless companions on a country road with a single tree. Beckett accomplishes two things by using this style of comedy. Comedy routines have a beginning and an ending. For Godot the routine begins at the opening of the play and ends at the intermission. Once the routine is over, it cannot continue. The routine must be done again. This creates the second act. The second act, though not an exact replication, is basically the first act repeated. The routine is put on again for the audience. The same chain of events: Estragon sleeps in a ditch, Vladimir meets him at the tree, they are visited by Pozzo and Lucky, and a boy comes to tell them that Godot will not be coming but will surely be there the following day. In this way repetition dictates the structure of the play. There is no climax in the play because the only thing the plot builds to is the coming of Godot. However, after the first act the audience has pretty much decided that Godot will never show up. It is not very long into the second act before one realizes that all they are really doing is wasting time, “Waiting for...waiting.” (50) By making the second act another show of the same routine, Beckett instills in us a feeling of our own waiting and daily routines. What is everyday for us but another of the same act. Surely small things will change, but overall we seem to be living out the same day many times over. Another effect of repetition on the structure of Godot is the amount of characters in the play. As mentioned before, the play is set up like a Vaudeville routine. In order to maintain the integrity of the routine, the play must be based around these two characters. This leaves no room for extra characters that will get in the way of the act. To allow for the repetition of the routine to take place the cast must include only those characters who are necessary it. The idea that the two characters are simply passing time is evident in the dialogue. The aforementioned phrase, “Nothing to be done,” is one example of repetition in dialogue. In the first half-dozen pages of the play the phrase is repeated about four times. This emphasizes the phrase so that the audience will pick up on it. It allows the audience to realize that all these two characters have is the hope that Godot will show up. Until the time when Godot arrives, all they can do is pass the time and wait. The first information we learn about the characters is how Estragon was beaten and slept in a ditch. We get the sense that this happens all the time. This is nothing new to the characters. They are used to this routine. The flow of the play is based around this feeling that the characters know where each day is headed. The audience feels that the characters go through each day with the hope that Godot will come and make things different. In at least three instances in the play characters announce that they are leaving and remain still on the stage. These are examples of how the units of the play are effected individually by repetition. Again, Becket emphasizes this for a reason. This is best shown in the following beat: Pozzo: I must go. Estragon: And your half-hunter? Pozzo: I must have left it at the manor. Silence Estragon: Then adieu. Vladimir: Adieu. Pozzo: Adieu. Silence. No one moves. Vladimir: Adieu. Pozzo: Adieu. Estragon: Adieu. Silence. Pozzo: And thank you. Vladimir: Thank you. Pozzo: Not at all. Estragon: Yes yes. Pozzo: No no. Vladimir: Yes yes. Pozzo: No no. Silence. Pozzo: I don’t seem to be able...(long hesitation)...to depart. Estragon: Such is life.(31) The last two pieces of the excerpt is very literal. The idea that going someplace is doesn’t matter, because there is really nowhere to go. All you can do is find someplace else to wait. Also repeated in the beat is the stage direction for silence. Silence occurs in life and theater is just a reflection of our lives. It is, in effect, a line of dialogue. Repeated silence outlines the awkwardness of the beat. The repetition then creates the tone of the beat. Many of the play’s beats are comprised of some type of repetition. “All I know is that the hours are long, under these conditions, and constrain us to beguile them with proceedings which-how shall I say-which may at first sight seem reasonable, until they become a habit.”(52) Here Beckett has a character state flat out what is happening in the play. The plot of the play is based around repetition. All the pieces of their lives have become habit. When at first they were ways to pass the days they have become repeated, and through this repetition they have become unreasonable. The habit that controls our lives is the same habit that fuels the characters in Godot. The same habit that makes the structure of Godot a repetition in itself. In the first act, the goings-on in the play may seem reasonable to the audience. Merely a way for these two people to pass the hours of their particular day. By making the second act the same routine, the tragic humor of their situation is revealed. Estragon and Vladimir are stuck in this way of life. Bound to making each day more of the same, because they can find no other way to deal with their lives then to try to pass the time. All the ideas of the play and all the questions that are raised are highlighted through the use of repetition. Therefore, the structure of the play is dominated by this single characteristic of the play.。